A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On October 5, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. in the Suwon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on April 16, 2012.

On March 20, 2014, around 07:05, the Defendant: (a) crossed the road front of the 244th Annyang-gu Mayang-gu Mayang-gu, Mayang-gu; (b) demanded D to detect and move the Defendant to a safe place; and (c) made D “I am gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gys; (d) this gy gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly gly

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers working at 112 patrols.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal history records, investigation reports (the confirmation of the date of release of the accused) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The Defendant committed the instant crime with the reason for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act, among repeated criminal offenders, committed the instant crime in the course of repeated acts involving a police officer who, without permission, crosses the criminal justice and restrains him from doing so.

The defendant's motive or circumstance revealed that the police did not properly investigate the death case of the father of the defendant who occurred around 1999, and that the defendant's notification by the police would have been practically and effectively taken place whenever he/she seeks his/her workplace as a security guard after his/her previous conviction according to the ruling. However, considering this, the defendant committed the same kind of crime again during the period of repeated offense according to the previous conviction of the defendant who has multiple criminal records.