1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. The Defendant: KRW 90,000 to C who applied for compensation; and KRW 90,00 to D who applied for compensation.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, “2013 Highest 618”, even though the Defendant did not possess any goods and did not intend or have the ability to sell the goods because of lack of any particular revenue and property, he was able to receive money and valuables by means of receiving advance payments by reporting the purchase of goods posted on the Internet website “Nber Hk” and communicating the victims who posted the writing with the victims as if they sold the goods.

On July 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported the purchase text of the “Nber H Carbook” posted by the victim I to the “NV PC” from the original PC room in the original city; and (b) made false contact to the victim as if he/she sold the above performance ticket; and (c) received 600,000 won from the victim, namely, through the account of the community credit cooperatives in the name of the Defendant, for the price of goods, from the victim.

In addition, from May 29, 2013 to September 6, 2013, the Defendant received a total of KRW 2,843,000 from the victims, as described in the separate sheet of crime, as described above.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victims.

On August 29, 2013, 2013, the Defendant reported that “Nurber H Kafbook” posted by the Victim J to the “Nurber H Kaf Pat” in the PC room in the PC room in the PC room in the PC room in the PC room in the PC room in the PC room in the PC room in the PC room, and made a false representation as if the Defendant had contacted the victim, thereby selling the above t

However, there was no intention or ability to sell a camping ticket to the victim because the defendant did not have a camping ticket, and there was no particular income or property.

Nevertheless, the defendant received 200,000 won from the one bank account in the name of the defendant under the name of the defendant in the name of the victim, i.e., Tweet price.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police protocol of statement against G, I,K, L, M, N, D, andO;

1. F, C, P, E, Q, R, T, U, and J.