All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (fact-finding) ① Defendant A merely proceeded with B users F, a stock company it operates, and one Vietnam female female member, and Defendant A did not gather 10 Vietnam female female members at the hotel that was the place of the above-line, and Defendant A did not mislead F of the fact that there was no misunderstanding about the above female members of the above women, and ② local intermediaries had taken Vietnam female members of the above women as courtesy, but they could not go back to F because they were not the opposite party in advance, because they were not the opposite party in advance. Although there was time difference, Defendant A introduced two other parties or more during the same time while arranging marriage as an international marriage broker, Defendant A was guilty of all the charges of this case. In so determining, the court below erred by misapprehending the fact that all of the charges of this case was guilty.

2. Determination

가. 원심은, 검사가 제출한 증거들에 의하면 F이 2013. 8. 6. 베트남 하이퐁 소재 E호텔 2층 웨딩홀 신부대기실에 앉아있었고, 베트남 여성이 한명씩 위 신부대기실에 들어오는 방법으로 F이 총 10명 정도의 베트남 여성들을 보았으며, 그 중 F이 마음에 드는 여성 3명을 지목한 사실을 인정할 수 있는바, 베트남 여성이 순차적으로 한 명씩 들어왔다고 하더라도 그 시간적 연속성, 장소적 동일성을 고려할 때 이는 이용자에게 같은 시간에 2명 이상의 상대방을 소개한 행위에 해당한다고 보아, 이 사건 공소사실을 유죄로 판단하였다.

B. The above judgment of the court below is examined by comparing the above judgment with records, and the purport of Articles 26(2)9 and 12-2 subparag. 2 of the Marriage Business Management Act is to contribute to the formation of a sound marriage culture by guiding and fostering the marriage brokerage business in a sound manner and by protecting users.