A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) driven a body car D with D around 00:01 on the same day; (b) escaped, instead of Jinju, 207, around 207, on the same day; (c) the police officer of the Jinju E District, who received a 112 report, was aware of the Defendant’s number of the said car from the witness when he heard the witness’s statement before the said so-called marc; (d) the Defendant, at the same time, did not immediately proceed in the vicinity of the said place; and (e) discovered that the said car was on the road; (e) discovered that the Defendant was on the road; and (e) tried to drive the said car on the GG parking lot at around 00:20 on the same day; and (e) tried to drive the car by drinking alcohol; and (e) tried to remove the car’s shape of drinking through drinking, etc.; and (e) tried to see the Defendant’s shape of drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to 112 reporting duties.

2. On the same day as indicated in paragraph (1) above, Defendant 1 driven a vehicle under the influence of alcohol by a police officer I belonging to the above E zone, who was arrested as an offender in the act of committing an act of committing an act of committing an offense at H around 00:5 on the same day as indicated in paragraph (1) above, while driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as: (a) Defendant 1 was arrested as a police officer belonging to the above E zone; and (b) Defendant 1 was driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking alcohol; and (c) confirmation of the fact of drinking through a drinking reduction device;

There was a reasonable reason to determine a person, so it was demanded to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting approximately 10 minutes and three times in a drinking measuring instrument.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for drinking alcohol measurement without any justifiable reason because he could not see any reaction without being able to take part in the speaker who had been in the above E District Office.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;