logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.10.18 2017고단657
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 24, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (measures after Accidents) was parked in a parking lot while driving a rocketing car while under the influence of alcohol concentration in the first floor parking lot of the commercial building located in D at the time of Won-si on February 24, 2017;

F The part of the driver's seat in front of the F SP car was filled with the back part of the lower part of the Defendant, and damaged the above SP car to be repaired by the U.S. repair cost, such as the exchange of the strings, such as the opening of the strings, and did not take measures to prevent any danger on the road and ensure smooth traffic flow on the road, and left the scene without leaving the strings without leaving the door alone.

2. On February 24, 2017, at around 19:40, the Defendant attempted to flee from the front side of the 302 'Scam apartment' located in the 63rd city of Won-si on the same day. On the same day, around 18:50, the Defendant reported that the Defendant driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol without taking any measures against traffic accident, and requested the police officers belonging to the Hanju Police Station Ger in the Kuju Police Station, who called the Defendant, to confirm the drinking in such a way as to make the police officers under the police officers under the police officers under the Hanju Police Station of the Kuwon Police Station, and tried to confirm the drinking by inserting the alcohol so as to make it difficult for him to drink the breath, and therefore, the above H tried the chest of the above H to the front side of the Defendant, by assaulting the parts of the breath, leading the Defendant to a breath, leading the breath of drinking, leading the breath of drinking.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers for 112 reported mobilization and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police to H, I, J, and K;

1. Written estimate;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs and damaged parts of the photograph;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 148 of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow