1. On September 1, 2019, around 17:35, the Plaintiff’s Defendant with respect to contact accidents that occurred on the road in Southern-gu Busan-do.

1. Basic facts

(a) On September 1, 2019, the driver of the DP vehicle (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff vehicle”) stops along the three-lanes of the third-lane road in the Southern-dong Busan Metropolitan City, the driver of the vehicle is proceeding in the same direction as in the front direction, while stopping along the signal signal at the same three-lanes of the third-lane road in the Nam-gu, Busan.

In addition, the following parts of the E-to-land part of Defendant Driving (hereinafter “Defendant O-to-land”) stopping in the signal atmosphere were even contacted with the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle by the front part.

B. The Defendant was issued a medical certificate to the effect that the above contact requires around two weeks stability fees for the light and the tensions with the base of the climatic and the tensions.

C. The Plaintiff is an insurer for the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, Eul evidence No. 1 to 5, or the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff asserts that there is no insurance money liability because the contact in this case was not a contact to the extent that the defendant suffered an injury or that the damage was inflicted on the defendant Oral Ba, and the defendant claimed that the defendant suffered an injury due to the contact in this case and disposed of the damage as a result of the damage inflicted on the defendant and the damage to the defendant Oral Ba, and that the plaintiff is liable as the insurer of the plaintiff's vehicle for the medical expenses and the damage caused by the accident in this case

The following circumstances as shown in the purport of the entire argument of the evidence revealed in the above, and the vehicle was not taken from the screen image of the Plaintiff’s vehicle at the time of the above contact, and the vehicle was not taken from the shock; due to the above contact, the vehicle was not driven or used, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s Republic of Korea did not show shock.

In this regard, the Plaintiff’s driver, who was unaware of the contact, seems to have been aware of the contact since the Defendant left the front while leaving the vehicle back to the rear. Thus, the Defendant and the Plaintiff appear to have been aware of the contact.