1. According to the plaintiff's expansion of the purport of the claim in this court, the defendant shall pay 823,520 won to the plaintiff as well as 820 won.

At the time of the accident, at around 18:25, February 28, 2019, Defendant Oba D E, at the time of the accident, parked on the path while the Plaintiff’s vehicle in the situation of the two-lane collision near the Jungdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, was driving along the two-lanes of the above road, and changed the lane into one-lane by avoiding the F vehicle (Co-Defendant G Co-Defendant Company in the first instance trial) entering the road. Defendant Oba, which had different one and two-lanes from the latter, paid the insurance money in which Defendant Oba had concealed the Plaintiff vehicle. ② Insurance money in the case of KRW 1,601,60 (payment on May 17, 2019): 1,154,400 (payment on March 24, 20200): 20% of the amount of self-paid loss of the Plaintiff’s self-paid vehicle (2,500,000 won).

1. The circumstances leading to the instant accident are as follows.

[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, entries and images of Gap evidence 1 to 12 (including additional numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserts that the accident of this case occurred due to the negligence of the plaintiff's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's vehicle's operation beyond one and two lanes from the front side of the plaintiff's vehicle. Accordingly, the defendant asserts that the accident occurred because the defendant's vehicle's accident occurred because the plaintiff's joint defendant's vehicle of the first instance, which started from the stop after the stop while the vehicle's operation on the first side of the plaintiff's vehicle was illegally overtaken to the second lane.

B. The following circumstances, which can be recognized by comprehensively taking account of the evidence and the overall purport of oral arguments as mentioned above, the driver of the defendant Oral Traca parked on the two-lane road, are shocking the part of the back part of the plaintiff vehicle that is changed from the second to the first lane by avoiding the co-defendant vehicle of the first instance court entering the two-lane road, and the driver of the plaintiff vehicle is driving the 1 and the second two-lane in the rear side of the plaintiff vehicle and driving the vehicle excessively close to the plaintiff vehicle, and the driver of the plaintiff vehicle is also a two-lane road.