logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.08.19 2016고단1725
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

A crime history room (Defendant A) around 06:50 on the end of December 2015, 2015, the defendant used a mobile phone at the defendant's residence in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu Seoul, and the fact is that the defendant did not prove that he did not respond to the victim D's request for money and valuables, but did not prove that he did not respond to the request for money and valuables. However, even though the victim D's response to the request for money and valuables against a certain church, the defendant did not prove that he did not respond to the request for money and valuables by using the E church D's press media that he would be punished for serious acts with others, and the E church D's press that he would be punished for a third party and a general assembly that he did not respond to the request for money and valuables without complying with the request.

It is necessary to post a letter that "D pastor, who is found to have been known to him/her at the face of a church and that he/she was aware of the money," and to continuously hold the above group held around 18:59 on the same day, and as if the victim F did not act or interfere with D', the above victim was recommended by D'D pastor and registered in January 2014 in the G church as he/she did so.

F her husband's office ( husband's D office).

It is in the shape that the House F.I.D. goes at a meeting at its own office and attached to H at its own will.

'Publicly false information through an information and communications network for the purpose of slandering by posting a letter, thereby impairing the honor of victims in the Republic of Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the screen of a Kakaogle fagled in a Kakao room, the cupture card of the complainant F, and the Kakao Stockholmn Stockholm;

1. Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of the Utilization of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. for Criminal Facts and Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of the elective Use of Criminal Proceeds, the choice of fines (the defendant puts a letter on an organization or toilet room between members of a church and limits the scope of the distribution, and the defendant is an initial offender who has no criminal history.

arrow