1. All of the plaintiff's claims that are changed in exchange at the trial are dismissed.

2. The Plaintiff’s total costs of litigation.

(b) is a believers with religious life;

The Defendant is a school juristic person that establishes and operates a “D University” referred to in the provisions of this paragraph for the purpose of providing specialized education based on the spirit of the classicality.

B. On April 2010, the Defendant Company E was demoteded to the effect that the students were “the students during the “permanent school theory” of the D University, which was the subject of collection by D University, and that the local council, etc. was defined as a different group by the Korean Film Association (integrated).”

What is this kind/private disturbance (Evidence No. 1, No. 3): G, H major curricula: E: Ethical content of resolution: Ethical, ancient, and Unified-Related Agency: The main contents of Ethical, Ethical, Ethical, Ethical: * Hethically, interpersonalism, explains that human beings should be the same as that of Natth, and describes that the personality of Ethical, Ethical, is incomplete.

* The Gisung Council was called as the Gisung Women of the Belgium, and denied pastors, worships, etc.

Activity Method: * The name of the BSG, EBS, etc. in the university is the sexual intercourse.

* Publication and distribution of various books, and sporessing and changing activities.

* The branch of a church using regional names (e.g., Seoul Educational Association, Gwangju Educational Association, Daegu Educational Association, etc.).

E on March 2015, 2015, a police officer distributed the printed materials of “F” (No. 1, No. 3) published by the Council for the Modernization of Private Teaching Institutes as a lecture supporting materials to students during the middle of his/her opening of his/her school.

Concerning the above inducements, the following contents are written as follows:

From May 6, 2010 to April 28, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) sent a certificate of content to the president office of D University on several occasions; and (b) requested the purport that “Local Educational Association is not a different group; (c) E specialist recognized D University students as local school groups and changed the local school group not to be a different group.”

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 5, and Eul No. 1.