(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.08.09 2019고단641

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.08.09 2019고단641

공용물건손상등

Text

A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 31, 2018, the Defendant damaged public goods: (a) around 01:55, at the front of the C cafeteria located in Jeju-si, Jeju-si, Jeju-si, the Jeju-dong Police Station D Zone D District E, which called “I will not be able to enjoy alcohol; (b) the Defendant arrived at the site and prevented the Defendant from departing from the site; and (c) the Defendant requested E, etc. to return home, while carrying out a bath, such as “I do not have governance; (d) I do not have governance; (e) I domin the back line of the driver’s seat on the side of the driver’s seat of the tea (C 13th, F rocketing), which was installed at that site, and caused damage to the utility of the Defendant by destroying goods used by public offices for repair costs equivalent to 20,000 won.”

2. At the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, the Defendant took a bath to the Jeju East Police Station D District E (the age of 39) affiliated with the Jeju East Police Station D District E (the age of 39) that prevents the Defendant from doing the above act, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant in this court;

1. Statement of the suspect examination of the accused prepared by the public prosecutor;

1. Statement of statement E prepared by the police officer;

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. Statement of a report (including attached documents) on investigation into, and a written estimate of, the police preparation;

1. Statement of the report-related department of the 112 case prepared by the police;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of each video of the relevant photographs is asserted to the effect that the defendant had been in a state of mental and physical disorder by stating that he was drunk at the time of each of the crimes in this case, and that he was in a state of mental and physical disorder. According to the records, it is recognized that the defendant had drinking alcohol to a certain extent at the time of each of the crimes in this case, but on the other hand, they are recognized

유사 판례

-제주지방법원 2020.11.13 2020고단1995

-제주지방법원 2020.10.30 2020고단1864

-제주지방법원 2019.07.12 2019고단295

-제주지방법원 2019.05.24 2018고단2570

-서울동부지방법원 2014.06.25 2014고단1075