The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of all the circumstances surrounding the gists of the grounds for appeal, the defendant's alleged facts are false, and as long as the defendant did not verify the facts properly, the defendant's willful negligence on the statement of false facts should be recognized. However, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the facts charged of this case, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, by

2. Summary of the facts charged and the judgment of the court below

A. On August 27, 2015, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the said F by openly pointing out false facts, while there was no fact that the Victim F made a public performance of “G” in the musical theater located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul (E) around August 27, 2015, there was a large number of spectators who are unable to know his name inside the theater, and the Defendant refers to the said victim, and “this person was going to go to a camping 19 in a cam, 3 column 19.”

B. The court below held that in this case, the victim appears to have viewed a public performance by using digital pairs in a single-time public performance with a daily quantity at the 19 seat located on the side of the 19th floor located on VIP seat. ① The victim using the seat in the first floor of the first floor in which the performance can best be seen as close to the public performance, and the victim using the seat in the second floor in order to see the body located in the public performance hours as above close to the victim's body located in the above, can be seen as an exceptional, and ② the defendant continuously used the zom-in in the public performance with the hand of the victim, and argued that the victim used the campaign with a recording function. In fact, the products used by the victim at the time have been granted, the products used by the victim have a recording function, and have a digital system with a high level of digital information and management function.