1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part of the judgment against Plaintiff A, which constitutes the money ordering additional payments below.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning for the court’s explanation is as follows: (a) the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance; and (b) such reasoning is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In addition to those stated separately below the scope of the amount of damages, the corresponding item of the attached Table of the calculation of the amount of damages shall be the same as the corresponding item of the calculation of the amount of damages, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis in principle, but less than the last month and less than KRW 10 shall be discarded. The current value at the time of the accident shall be the simple interest rate which deducts the intermediate interest at the rate of 5/12 per annum. The difference between the parties’ arguments shall be dismissed. A. In addition, the personal information of KRW 19,583,703 in the attached Table of the calculation of the amount of damages shall be as stated in the “basic matters” column.

2) Vocational income and operation period: 1,50,00 won per month, and approximately two years after the date of the accident, until January 31, 2018, when the accident in this case occurred, the Plaintiff’s age was 66 years of age or around February 2016, which was 2 years after entering into a labor contract with FF stock company, and had worked as security guards at the new site of apartment construction, and for two years of age in the future due to the nature of the work, it seems that the Plaintiff would have been able to engage in the said work (after the termination of the labor contract, the Plaintiff claimed that the urban daily wage of the ordinary worker should be applied from the date of the termination of the labor contract, but it is difficult for Plaintiff A, who was 66 years of age or older

(3) 3) disability rate and labor disability rate A) - The rate of disability - The rate of labor disability by period of 100% from February 4, 2016 to December 23, 2016, which is the hospitalization period - the calculation of 27% from January 31, 2018 at the end of operation from the following day: the statement in the column of “total amount of daily income” in the attached Form of damages calculation sheet.

(b) Wang Ho Ho Ho Ho Ho, 5,660,280 won, the part and part of the injury the plaintiff A suffered.