1. The following amounts, among the parts against the principal suit of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall constitute an additional payment order:

Basic Facts

The court's explanation on this part is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

According to the above fact that the judgment on the claim for damages occurred, the defendant is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.

In addition to the matters provided separately below the scope of the liability for damages, it shall be as specified in the attached Form of the calculation table of damages, and the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.

The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.

In addition, it is rejected that the parties' arguments are not stated separately.

Personal information on lost income: The same shall apply to the entries in the column for calculation of the amount of damages in attached Form.

Occupational and Income: Plaintiff A, as at the time of the instant accident, worked as an employee of the stamp control tower, 2,798,968 won per month while working as an employee of the stamp control tower, Inc. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) at the time of the instant accident, was retired on December 7, 2011, the said money was recognized as Plaintiff A’s income.

(1) The defendant argues that the above income cannot be applied from December 8, 201, since the plaintiff A retired from office on December 7, 2011. However, since the plaintiff A's age, period of service, and other social, economic conditions, and empirical rule were to be able to obtain the above income even after his retirement, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted). The ratio of labor disability and labor disability loss rate is 4.2% for five years from the date of the evaluation of Mabroth disability assessment table, corresponding to Mabroth disability damage V-D-2-a, and corresponding to Mabrothm damage V-2-a, 4.2% from the date of the evaluation of Mabroth disability assessment (in light of the degree of the diverity of conical signboards such as the subsequent 5-6th of the year, the degree of contribution to the accident is reflected) the result of physical evaluation and fact inquiry with respect to the head of Eul University Hospital at the court of first instance.