1. The defendant,

A. As to KRW 286,770,410 among Plaintiff A and KRW 264,851,710 among them:

B. Plaintiff B 233,848.

1. The status of the party to the recognition of the part concerning Plaintiff A is the educational foundation that establishes and operates the D University.

Plaintiff

A on March 1, 1986, the name was changed to the Food Production Department (hereinafter referred to as the "Food Bioscience Department") of D Universities and Colleges as full-time instructors, and was promoted to professors on June 1, 200 through assistant professors and associate professors.

The Defendant’s dismissal and lawsuit against Plaintiff A were conducted on April 16, 2007 on the ground that Plaintiff A, while organizing and leading the D College Professors Council (hereinafter “Professor”) and spreading false facts, he/she committed disciplinary reasons such as collective action for activities other than his/her duties, defamation of school order and policy, impairment of school order as a teacher and staff, and spread of false facts, etc.; and that Plaintiff A, while holding office as a member of the above university teachers’ personnel committee, was subject to disciplinary reasons for violation of the duty of confidentiality by divulging confidential information of D university.

Plaintiff

On May 15, 2007, A filed a petition review with the Appeal Commission for Teachers seeking revocation of the above dismissal, and on July 24, 2007, the Appeal Commission for Teachers decided to revoke the above dismissal on the ground that the ground that the grounds for disciplinary action against the Plaintiff A is not recognized.

The Defendant filed a lawsuit against a teacher’s appeals review committee against the Seoul Administrative Court No. 2007Guhap39275, which sought revocation of the above revocation. However, on June 11, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a dismissal ruling, and appealed as Seoul High Court No. 2008Nu19101, but was sentenced to a dismissal ruling on January 14, 2009. The Defendant appealed as Supreme Court Decision 2009Du2900, but was sentenced to a dismissal ruling on April 9, 2009.

After the decision of the above Supreme Court case No. 2009Du2900 was rendered, the defendant did not return to the original state after the plaintiff A requested the reinstatement.

Accordingly, the plaintiff A is the Jeonju District Court.