logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.07 2014고단9246
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 14:00 on September 30, 2014, the Defendant, who violated the thief and Automobile Management Act, stolen B registration license plate, which was parked in the vicinity of the used cars trading complex in Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, with the victim’s (ju), Gangnam-dong, Abaco-ownership, and removed the victim’s B registration license plate, using the tools.

Accordingly, the Defendant removed a registration number plate without obtaining permission from the Mayor/Do Governor and stolen another’s property.

2. The Defendant violated the Automobile Management Act and the date and time set forth in paragraph (1) and at the place set forth in paragraph (1). The Defendant used the two-wheeled automobile registration number plate for the purpose of the use by attaching the B registration number plate that was stolen as set forth in paragraph (1) to the Defendant, and used the registration number plate under the Automobile Management Act unlawfully.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the unlawful use air exercise, and the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents did not subscribe to mandatory insurance, and around November 10, 2014, around 09:30, the Defendant operated a two-wheeled automobile registration number plate, which was unlawfully used, as described in paragraph (2), at the Ganpo-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City Ganpo-dong, which was operated.

In such a case, a person engaged in driving service neglected the duty of care to prevent an accident by driving the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver, which was conducted as it was, due to negligence by neglecting the duty of care to prevent the accident in advance, and caused the victim C (n, 73 years old) who was placed on the right side of the direction of the defendant's proceeding to suffer an injury, such as a dubation of the left side copy which requires about seven weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. The actual survey report and the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. A certificate of completion of report on the use of a two-wheeled motor vehicle, such as a ozone photo;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 81 of the Automobile Management Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow