beta
Cases
Do 2015 8834 A. Violation of national security law
B. Violation of anti-public law
(c) Spy;
(d) Assistance in espionage;
(e) Attempted agents;
(f) A crime of aiding and abetting espionage;
Defendant
1. (b) d.
A
2. (b) d.
net B
3. D.
net C
4.(a)(b)
Network D
5.(a)(b)
BO (former name before opening: E)
Appellants
1. Defendant A
2. Defendant B’s person F
3. Defendant Sea C’s G
4. The natural Z of the defendant network D.
5. Defendant BO
Appellant
Prosecutor
Defense Counsel
Corporation I (Defendant-Appellant A, A, B, network C, network D and each of them)
Attorney J in charge
K, a legal entity, K (for the defendant and the applicant for a new trial, BO)
Attorney in charge L
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2014No 3377 decided May 21, 2015
Imposition of Judgment
October 29, 2015
Text
All of the appeals shall be dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal shall be determined.
For the same reasons as the judgment of the court below, the court below maintained the judgment of the court of first instance, which rendered a verdict of not guilty on the ground that the facts charged in the instant case were not proven as a crime. In light of the records on the reasoning of the judgment of the court below, the judgment of the court below did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, such as the allegation of the grounds for appeal, and by violating the logical and empirical rule, and thereby exceeding the limit of the principle of free evaluation of evidence.
Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Kim So-young
Justices Lee In-bok et al.
Justices Ko Young-han
Justices Lee Ki-taik