Do 2015 17478 A. thief

(b)thief;

1. A.

2. B

Prosecutor

Attorney D, V, W, and E (Defendant A) who is a legal entity C

Cheongju District Court Decision 2015 203 decided October 16, 2015

March 24, 2016

all appeals shall be dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are determined.

Examining the reasoning of the original judgment in light of the record, it is reasonable to reverse the judgment of the first instance, which found Defendant B guilty on the ground that the charge of larceny and larceny aiding and abetting was not proven by the relevant crime, among the facts charged against Defendant B of the instant case, and to render a verdict of innocence. The judgment of the court of first instance, which found Defendant guilty on the ground that Defendant was not proven by the relevant crime, is justifiable, and there is no illegality of finding Defendant guilty of facts by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, such as the allegation of the grounds of appeal, or by violating the legal rules of logic and experience, or by exceeding the limit of the due diligence of free evaluation.

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Kwon Soon-il

[Attachment-dae]

Justices Park Poe-young

Justices Kim Shin-chul