beta
Cases
Do 2014 14281 A. Violation of the National Security Act
B. Violation of anti-public law
C. Violation of subparagraph 9 of the Presidential Emergency Measures
Defendant
1. (a). (b)
A
2.(a)(b)
net B
3.(a)(b)
C
Appellant
Prosecutor
Defense Counsel
D. Law firm (for all of the defendants)
Attorney E, AL, AM,N, AO, AP, AP, Q
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2011Redo 113 decided October 16, 2014
Imposition of Judgment
May 28, 2015
Text
all appeals shall be dismissed.
Reasons
The grounds of appeal are also determined.
Upon examining the record, it is reasonable to reverse the judgment of the court of first instance and to render a verdict of innocence on the charge of violation of the State Security Act against the Defendants and violation of the anti-public law against Defendant C among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds as stated in the judgment of the court below on the grounds as stated in the judgment below. It is reasonable to reverse the judgment of the court of first instance and to render a judgment of innocence on the charge of violation of the anti-public law against Defendant C, on the grounds as stated in the judgment of the court below. There is no illegality such as going beyond the limit of free conviction due to the violation of the legal principles on the logic and experience, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the autonomy of confession and the national security law and anti-public law.
Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.
Justices Park Jae-young
Justices Lee Sang-hoon
Justices Kim Chang-suk
Justices Jo Hee-de
Justices Park Sang-ok