logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.12.22 2017고정406
여객자동차운수사업법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

1. On June 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 18:22 on the facts charged, at around 18:22, provided that three persons, such as B, etc., in front of the Sin-Gun, Sin-gun, Sin-gun, Sin-gun, Sin-gun, Sin-gun, Sin-Gun, were to receive KRW 60,000,000 in return for burning, and provided C’s private cars for transportation at a cost.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the defendant can only be recognized as having promised to sell the above automobile upon receiving KRW B and KRW 60,000,00, and there is no evidence to prove the fact that the defendant received money from B, etc. and transported the above automobile B, etc., and thus, the above automobile was provided for transportation with compensation.

shall not be required to do so.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, a judgment of innocence is rendered after Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow