A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with labor at the Daegu District Court on January 3, 2013 due to the crime of interference with business, etc. and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 27, 2013.

The defendant was living in Daegu Northern-gu C Apartment 105 1605 dong 1605 and had weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to mental disorder caused by alcohol acute addiction.

1. Interference with business;

A. On July 4, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the duties of the head of the victim C Apartment management office D, who was employed by the victim D, etc. at a time from around 10:00 to around 15:00, in the said C Apartment management office, with four times of alcohol, and without any reason, took a bath at the victim D, without any reason, and took the documents on his/her book after walking with the chair, thereby obstructing the victim, who was employed in the said C Apartment management office, from performing his/her normal duties, thereby obstructing the victim’s apartment management office duties by force.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's work by force.

B. On April 11, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol on April 11, 2012; (b) went into a childcare center for the victim E’s operation on the first floor of the said C Apartment Management Office; and (c) without any reason, went into the childcare center without any justifiable reason.

The Defendant expressed his desire to prevent the Defendant from entering the above child care center that he could not know his name, and threatened him with drinking as he could flick and flick.

In addition, the Defendant, who was seated at the center center center center center of the above child care center, and scamed, scamed, scamed, scamed, so that children of the above child care center can escape the Defendant from the damaged room, thereby obstructing the operation of the child care center by force.

Accordingly, the defendant is a victim by force.