The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff (gender: female) served as an assistant principal of Pyeongtaek-si from March 1, 2015 to B elementary school located therein.

On September 11, 2018, from around 17:30 to 18:30, the Plaintiff made a statement of sexual harassment to C with the principal F and the teacher, who was going at the E-cafeteria located in Pyeongtaek-si D, at the lowest of the school as follows:

The term "huma huma k' and kisk also kis."

B. On July 12, 2019, the Gyeonggi-do General Disciplinary Committee for Public Educational Officials decided disciplinary action against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff’s sexual harassment against the teachers C (genders) working at B elementary schools on the following terms and conditions, thereby violating Article 63 of the State Public Officials Act. On July 17, 2019, the Defendant imposed disciplinary action against the Plaintiff in accordance with the above decision.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a petition review on August 16, 2019, but the appeals review committee dismissed the said claim on October 30, 2019.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 19, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion is unlawful for the following reasons.

1) The non-existence of the fact that there is a cause for the disposition is an ordinary conversation with C after hearing the speech from C that there was a male-friendly Gu, and C made a speech to C, stating that “It is necessary to do so too much good. It is necessary to do so even if many people are good. They do not have a telephone from day to day, and I see that it must be well-known.” The statement as stated in the reason for the disposition of the instant case (hereinafter “the instant statement”).

of this subsection.

The instant remarks were made by the President F, who is not the Plaintiff, and F, after the instant remarks, the buyer differs depending on where he goes out of the panty.

As such, I think about where he goes off.