1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff (gender: female) served as the principal of the Pyeongtaek-si elementary school located in Pyeongtaek-si from September 1, 2017 to February 28, 2019, and is working as the principal of the C elementary school located in Chungcheongnam-si from March 1, 2019.

On September 11, 2018, from around 17:30 to 18:30, the Plaintiff made a statement of sexual harassment to G with the assistant principal F and the teacher G, who was going at the E-cafeteria located in Pyeongtaek-si D, at the lowest of the following:

“I am off, I am off, anywhere, in accordance with where I am off, I am out of what I am.”

B. On July 17, 2019, the Gyeonggi-do General Disciplinary Committee for Public Educational Officials decided to take disciplinary action for three months of salary reduction on the ground that the following Plaintiff’s act violates Article 63 (Duty to Maintain Dignity) of the State Public Officials Act. On July 17, 2019, the Defendant was subject to disciplinary action for three months of salary reduction against the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter referred to as "the disposition of this case". (c)

The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a petition review on August 16, 2019, but the appeals review committee dismissed the said claim on October 30, 2019.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s instant disposition is unlawful for the following reasons.

On September 11, 2018, the non-existence of the grounds for disposition, the plaintiff, G teacher, and the F assistant principal of the Republic of Korea were Supperd, G had a male-gu, and G had a speech about private subjects during a series of dialogues inside and outside of work. Accordingly, the plaintiff or F divided various dialogues in relation thereto.

F has been asked G about the degree of slance with male-friendly implements, and G led to a conversation related to male-friendly implements in a brut atmosphere, rather than displeasure.

At that time, when the plaintiff was traveling to Singapore, female Gad son himself.