logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.04.29 2015나72070
부당이득금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except that the court “this court” under Section 18 of the second instance judgment as “court of the first instance,” and the “date of pronouncement of judgment” under Section 8 of the third instance judgment as “date of pronouncement of the first instance judgment,” respectively, is the same as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, and thus, it shall be cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just as it is concluded, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow