1. Defendant A indicated in attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 1 among the real estate listed in attached Table 1’s list of real estate in attached Table 1’s list.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. On July 31, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) around July 31, 201, part of “A” as indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article to Defendant A on board (hereinafter “C resting part”) and 7.56 square meters; (b)

(D) Part 7.56 square meters inboard “A” in paragraph (2) of the same Article (hereinafter referred to as “D resting part”).

(2) From August 1, 201 to December 31, 2011, the Plaintiff leased each term of lease at KRW 2,500,000, monthly rent of KRW 2,000 (five days per month of payment). (2) On July 1, 2012, the Plaintiff leased each term of lease to Defendant A the term of lease of KRW 2,20,000,000 from July 1, 201 to December 31, 2012, each of the term of lease of KRW 2,50,000 from July 31, 2012 to December 31, 201, and monthly rent of KRW 2,20,00,000, C,300,000.

3) The above lease agreement was explicitly renewed between the Plaintiff and the Defendant A, but the Plaintiff and Defendant A agreed on July 1, 2013 to increase the monthly rent of KRW 4,400,000 to the C rest area. (4) Defendant A did not pay to the Plaintiff the monthly rent of KRW 4,400,00 until December 5, 2014.

[Defendant A paid that: (a) on December 19, 2014, immediately after being served with the preparatory documents set forth in paragraph (5) below, the Defendant paid that: (b) on November 19, 2014;

(5) On December 15, 2014, a preparatory document prepared by the Plaintiff on December 18, 2014 was served on Defendant A on December 18, 2014, to the effect that the above lease agreement with Defendant A is terminated on the grounds of two or more vehicles of the Defendant A.

6) Defendant B, along with Defendant A, occupies the D resting area while operating a specialty store in the D resting area. [The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries in the evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6, and 7, the witness E’s testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the lease contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant A is terminated by the service of the preparatory documents as of December 15, 2014. Thus, barring any special circumstance, the Plaintiff is entitled to possess C’s and D’s part of the rest area and D’s part.