beta
Text
1. Of the real estate listed in the attached list, the Defendant indicated in the attached list to the Plaintiff, indicated in the attached list (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (13), and (14).
Reasons
1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as to the grounds for the claim by Gap's evidence Nos. 3 through 6 and Eul's evidence Nos. 1 through 6, the plaintiff is entitled to 61.2 square meters of residential facilities of the first floor (hereinafter referred to as "the building part of this case") and 61.2 square meters of residential facilities of the first floor (hereinafter referred to as "the building part of this case"), which are successively connected each point of the real estate listed in the separate sheet between the defendant and the defendant on October 4, 2013, among the real estate listed in the separate sheet.
(C) The term of the lease agreement with respect to any security deposit of KRW 5,00,000, monthly rent of KRW 350,000, monthly rent of KRW 10,000, monthly rent of KRW 10,000, and the term of the lease of KRW 10,000 as of October 10, 2015 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).
The fact that the Defendant paid the Plaintiff the rent for October 2013. The Defendant paid the rent for KRW 300,000 on behalf of the Plaintiff and KRW 180,000 on real estate brokerage commission to the Plaintiff on December 24, 2013 in lieu of the payment for the rent for KRW 520,00 on November 24, 2013 to the Plaintiff on December 24, 2013. The Defendant paid the Plaintiff the rent for the period from February 2014 to May 2014, and it is recognized that the Defendant paid the Plaintiff the rent for the period from September 10, 2014 to June 2014 without paying the rent for the period from July 2014 to July 10, 2014, and it was evident that the Plaintiff’s declaration of intention to terminate the instant rent for the reason that the instant rent for at least two years was terminated was terminated on July 21, 2014.
I would like to say.
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant building portion to the Plaintiff and pay the amount calculated by applying the rate of KRW 350,000 per month from July 11, 2014 to the completion date of delivery of the said building.
2. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices, on the ground that the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable.