1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 1,900,410; (b) KRW 1,105,180; and (c) KRW 651,870; and (c) KRW 651,870, respectively, to Plaintiff C.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business Approval and Notice - G (H Day in Busan Metropolitan Government) - G on August 8, 2012, I, 2014, the same J on April 2, 2014;

(b) Project operator: Defendant;

(c) The adjudication of expropriation by the Central Land Tribunal of Busan Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as "each adjudication of this case") - The appraisal court of the Plaintiff and the compensation for losses (unit of KRW 160,635,00 319,520 313,916,250 250 m2, 165 m2, 300 m250 m2, 165 m2, 2000 m2, 165 m2, 165 m2, 200 m2, 165 m2, 200 m2, 165 m2, 200 m2, 165 m2, 200 m2, 97 m25 m2, 97 m2, 165 m2, 250 m2,07 m265 m2,57 m2,065 m2

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Each of the compensation prices determined in each of the instant rulings by the plaintiffs' assertion is considerably low in light of their value, thereby seeking an increase in the value of the compensation.

B. In a lawsuit concerning the increase or decrease of land expropriation compensation 1 for determination on the claim of Plaintiff C, D, E, and F, both the appraisal and the appraisal by the court appraiser, which form the basis of the determination, are different opinions in view of the factors for price assessment except for the category of goods, and there is no illegality in the method of appraisal and the remaining factors for price assessment.