1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인은 2016. 3. 7. 23:30 경 서울 마포구 C 앞 노상에서, 10 여 명의 행인들이 있는 자리에서 영업용 택시기사들 간에 통행문제로 시비가 있어 교통이 정체된 것을 발견하고 현장 정리 중이 던 서울 마포 경찰서 D 지구대 소속 경위 E에게 다가가 “ 야, 이 경찰 씹할 새끼야. 짭새 새끼들 니들 뭐하고 있냐,

Chewing mash .."Publicly insulting the victim by using a large speech.

2. On March 7, 2016, around 23:58, the Defendant was arrested as a current offender for the offense of insult in front of the D District of Mapo-gu Seoul Police Station D, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and then did not get off from the patrol vehicle.

E is subject to punishment for interference with the performance of official duties in the course of making food and drinking.

In spite of multiple warnings, “packers, hackers, and face” shall be discarded.

A. He shall have the care of any person.

“The face of the above E was quihed with the hand-to-saw.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

Each fact in the judgment

1. Any statement made by a witness E or G in compliance with this Court;

1. Any statement made to E in compliance with the statement protocol prepared by the assistant judicial police officer;

1. Any description of the complaint prepared by E, which is appropriate for such statement;

1. Among the photographs, each of them can be recognized by comprehensively taking account of the images suitable for them, and there is proof.

(A) The Defendant submitted a motion picture made at the time of the motion to the effect that police officers E submitted the motion picture to the effect that he/she arrested him/herself without the sea. However, the voice presumed to have been recorded in the motion picture in question refers to “may refuse and defense counsel,” and only notified so-called “the U.S. Principle”.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act (influence of insult) regarding criminal facts, and the Criminal Act.