logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1981. 10. 13. 선고 81도1565 판결
[이용사및미용사법위반][공1981.12.15.(670),14512]
Main Issues

(1) No license-free business;

Summary of Judgment

The act that the defendant prepared a facility for the use of the facility to the person who has obtained a license for the use of the facility at the Namsan Senior Complex belonging to the Korean Senior Citizens Association of the Republic of Korea, in which he/she is in general in charge, by means of a plan for raising the security of the center for senior citizens, is an act of using the facility by the person

[Reference Provisions]

Article 5 of the Private Use and Private Use Act

Escopics

Defendant

upper and high-ranking persons

Prosecutor

original decision

Seoul Criminal Court Decision 80No7513 delivered on March 11, 1981

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

We examine the prosecutor's grounds of appeal.

The purpose of the Act is to interpret that a person who has not obtained a license for a barber or beauty artist intends to contribute to the improvement of national health by prohibiting the person from running the business of using or beauty art business. The court below determined by the court below. The defendant is not purporting to prohibit the person who has obtained a license for a barber from leasing the facilities to the person who has obtained a license for a barber by installing the facilities for using the facilities in accordance with a plan for raising the expenses for senior citizens' center at the Southern Gyeongsan Labor Complex belonging to the department of the senior citizens' association, which belongs to the department of the senior citizens' association, and therefore, it is reasonable at the time of the original adjudication that the person cannot be deemed to have engaged in the business of using the facilities, and it cannot be said that there is no reason to argue.

Therefore, the appeal by the prosecutor of this case is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Lee Il-young (Presiding Justice)

arrow