A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 3. 18. 07:50경 서울 은평구 C, 2층에 있는 피해자 D(여, 65세)이 경영하는 ‘E이발관’에서, 술에 취한 상태로 들어가 이발을 해 달라고 하였으나 피해자가 술에 취한 사람은 이발을 안 해준다고 말하였다는 이유로 “씹할 년아, 씹하러 왔는데, 늙은 년이 배짱 튕기냐!” 등 욕설을 하는 등의 소란을 피워 약 40분 가량 위력으로 그녀의 이발관 영업업무를 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The essential point of the argument is that the victim did not obtain the user license, and thus, the victim’s service cannot be said to be protected under the Criminal Act.

2. Determination

A. Article 6(1) of the Public Health Control Act provides that “a person who intends to be a barber or beauty artist shall obtain a license from the head of a Si/Gun/Gu, as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, from one who falls under any of the following subparagraphs,” and Article 8(1) provides that “a person who has not obtained a barber’s license or beauty artist’s license under Article 6(1) shall not open a barber’s business or beauty art business or engage in such business: Provided, That the same shall not apply to the case where a person performs assistance in the

B. According to the above evidence and investigation report (related to the license as stated in the statement), E E E is F, F is a user license, and F is a victim without obtaining the user license. The victim is operating the E E with F without obtaining the user license.

According to the above facts, the victim's transfer to F with the user company's license.