logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고정783
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who produces the processed products of agricultural and fishery products while operating the “Dju Province” in the Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonbuk-gun.

A person who produces, processes, ships, or stores or displays agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof for the purpose of selling, or selling them shall indicate the country of origin on the raw materials of agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof, and no person shall put a false indication of the country of origin or put a mark likely to cause confusion therewith.

From April 4, 2014 to December 8, 2012, the Defendant purchased KRW 5,456,00 from the main movable property of KRW 341 cent 6,820km in an increase in import acid from KRW 147, 147-1.

From April 4, 2015 to January 13, 2015, the Defendant, using approximately 316 capture 6,320 km and smuggling purchased as above, indicated the place of origin of rice as “the use of domestic rice” and “75% rice (domestic acid)” in manufacturing 37,920 litres in the name of “E” and storing the remainder 50 wres in the form of “E” with the purpose of selling 80,510 wres per disease for the same period.

As a result, the Defendant falsely indicated the origin on the raw materials of processed agricultural and fishery products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. A statement of the details of detection and each investigation report;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. The current status of sales by the copy of business registration certificate, copy of specifications of transactions of movable property, and date of each customer;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the detection field photographs;

1. Relevant Articles 14 and 6 (1) 1 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and the Selection of Punishment for Criminal Facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's reasons for sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order.

arrow