logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.10.06 2015고단1103
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

The term "B farming association corporation" is a corporation that manufactures and sells bread, which is a processed product of agricultural and fishery products, and Defendant A is the representative director of the said corporation, as it is established for the purpose of manufacturing, selling, etc. confection Do, Jeonju-gun.

A person who produces, processes, ships, or stores or displays agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof for the purpose of selling, or selling them shall indicate the country of origin on the raw materials of agricultural and fishery products or the processed products thereof, and no person shall put a false indication of the country of origin or put a mark likely to cause confusion therewith.

1. From August 14, 2013 to February 11, 2015, Defendant A purchased at KRW 14,865,00 “E”, which was manufactured with “PPPPPPDs” and “PPPSs et al.” and “E” manufactured with “PPPS et al.” and “PPPS et al.” among imported products.

During the above period, the Defendant processed brebre and 9 kinds of brebre, etc., using E purchased as above, and stored and produced them in plastic fresh, and indicated the country of origin of the breter, “beer-in Korea,” on the top of the plastic fresh package, in a false manner.

Then, the Defendant sold approximately 71,19 bread to 143,471,253 local food stores, such as F, and to 4 kindergartens, such as G kindergarten, H kindergarten, I kindergarten, and J kindergarten for the same period.

As a result, the Defendant falsely indicated the origin on the raw materials of processed agricultural and fishery products.

2. Defendant B committed the same offense as that of the Defendant’s business in relation to the Defendant’s business at the same time and place as that of the foregoing paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant A by the police (excluding the K portion of statement);

1. Defendant A’s written confirmation;

1. Investigation report (the investigation and report on the purchase details of the milk farm);

1. Stickers,.

arrow