logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2020.10.19 2020고단145
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for nine months.

The Defendant shall pay C, an applicant for compensation, KRW 28,00,000.

3.2

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 2014, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim C made a false statement to the Defendant and the victim working together with the Defendant and the victim working as an insurance solicitor at the office where the Defendant and the victim worked as an insurance solicitor in Ansan-si, Seocho-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.”

However, even though the Defendant suffered loss of KRW 00 million in the course of stock transaction, the Defendant thought that the Defendant would consume the loans jointly and severally guaranteed by the victim through stock transaction, etc. without using the lease deposit, and there was no particular property or income, and there was no intention or ability to repay the principal and interest of the loan or to have the victim escape from the position of the joint and several

On October 29, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, had the victim obtain 7 million won each from E, F and G Co., Ltd., and 7 million won each from H, Co., Ltd., Ltd. to obtain joint and several sureties on October 30, 2014, thereby having the victim obtain property benefits equivalent to 28 million won each.

2. Crimes against the victim B;

A. On November 2014, the Defendant concluded that, in the foregoing office where the Defendant and the victim together worked as an insurance solicitor, “A gave a guarantee at the time of obtaining a loan within the country, but C was aware of the fact, and C’s husband came to know of the fact, and deducted C from the guarantee.” The Defendant concluded that “A will take out a joint and several guarantee after the two months from the guarantor, as he/she intends to obtain a loan necessary for repaying the loan.”

However, the defendant thought that the loan that the victim guaranteed was also consumed by the stock transaction expected to incur loss, etc., and the victim did not have any particular property or income, so that he/she can repay the principal and interest of the loan that the victim guaranteed or let the victim escape from the position of the joint guarantor within a short period

arrow