Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 19, 2018, around 14:40 on June 19, 2018, the Defendant’s insultd and threatened D with alcohol soldiers on the ground that D, an employee of the said restaurant, did not complete the payment of KRW 50,000 borrowed from the Defendant in front of the cafeteria “C” restaurant in Songpa-gu Seoul.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who asked the Defendant personal information for the handling of the 112 reported case by the victim police officer F, etc., who belongs to the Seoul Song-gu Police Station E (Seoul Police Station) who was sent to the scene around 14:50 on June 19, 2018 after having received D’s 112 report, asked the Defendant for the handling of the 112 reported case by the victim F, etc., who is the police officer belonging to the Seoul Song-gu Police Station E (hereinafter “Schchch”). The Defendant, in front of viewing the victim D, 10 pacters, and the above restaurant customers, she

The victim openly insultingd the victim, “I am new, I am new, I am kyer, and Mazyer at the end,” and “I am kyer at the end,” respectively.

2. Around 15:00 on June 19, 2018, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s lawful performance of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and investigation of reported cases and investigations, by assaulting F, such as pressing F’s chest by hand over several times, cutting F’s chest by hand, and destroying F’s arms to the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. G statements;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment, the