The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant has only been engaged in the business of arranging sexual traffic and has not engaged in the business of arranging sexual traffic.

2. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the lower court’s findings of fact and determination are justifiable, and the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

F In an investigative agency and the lower court’s trial, the Defendant engaged in commercial sex acts from January 2018 to February 2018 through the Defendant who had been engaged in the business of arranging commercial sex acts. At the time, the Defendant was taking a vehicle driving at the time and engaged in commercial sex acts, and the Defendant went through and communicates with customers, and issued business instructions to the women engaged in commercial sex acts. The picture (1.50,000 won per case) received from customers was settled every day by the Defendant (80,000 won per case) after the payment to the Defendant of the total amount of the commercial sex acts, and then the part of the vehicle (80,000 won per case) was settled every day from the Defendant within the vehicle. Although the account in the name of G was entered into the account in the name of the Defendant, G was also deposited in accordance with the direction of the Defendant, and the Defendant was a woman and the Defendant’s pet. The Defendant himself has been doing commercial sex acts for several years, and the Defendant voluntarily made a consistent statement to the purport that it would be very contradictory in itself.

Since there are no parts that conflict with the statements or objective circumstances of related persons, credibility is very high.

B. During the business period indicated in the facts charged, the Defendant kept three boxes of sexual traffic advertisements in his/her residence. On August 9, 2018, the Defendant was confiscated by an investigative agency.

C. P refers to the defendant's proposal from around April 2018 to July 2018 upon request by an investigative agency to find out a fact that the defendant can do so.