logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.05.23 2012고정5151
상해
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five hundred thousand won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 27, 2012, Defendant B was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Intimidation) at the Busan District Court on July 27, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 2, 2012.

On June 14, 2012, at around 17:25, the defendant was at the 14-dong, Busan District Office 14-dong, Busan District Office 13-dong, and the defendant was at the time of 14-dong, the defendant was at the time of 14-dong, Busan District Office 14-dong, and the defendant was at the time of 14-dong, the victim A (the age of 45) who was able to see the food that the defendant was living in a changer.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. On May 4, 2012, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months at the Busan District Court for fraud, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 15, 2012.

The defendant, as in paragraph (1), when the victim B (the 51-year-old age) took part of the defendant's body, such as the defendant, he saw him to do so, and caused him to do so one time.

Accordingly, the defendant caused the victim to suffer from an influence of the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. The result of the recycling of CCTV-recordings;

1. Statement of reference witnesses of E or F;

1. A report on investigation (Submission of photographs on the upper part of the body), and a report on investigation (Submission of a written opinion);

1. Previous convictions: Criminal records, case search, and judgment [Defendant B];

1. A’s legal statement;

1. The result of the recycling of CCTV-recordings;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records, case search, and application of statutes governing judgment;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act; Defendant A who selects a fine: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; Selection of a fine;

1. The latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act and Article 39 (1) of the same Act for concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the provisional payment orders;

1. Defendant A: Defendant A asserts that his act constitutes self-defense, which is aimed at escaping from the wrongful infringement of B, based on the judgment as to Defendant A’s assertion of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow