beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Daejeon District Court 2013Gadan212582
Title
Transfer of real estate owned by a delinquent taxpayer constitutes a fraudulent act.
Summary
In 2006-2007, the basic legal relations of the Plaintiff’s taxation claim have already occurred in the year 2006 where the Defendant calculated the processed purchase. The transfer of real estate owned by a delinquent and completed the registration of ownership transfer constitutes a fraudulent act detrimental to the obligee.
Cases
2013Na104064
Plaintiff and appellant
Korea
Defendant, Appellant
c c
Judgment of the first instance court
National Rotations
Conclusion of Pleadings
March 20, 2014
Imposition of Judgment
April 17, 2014
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. Purport of claim
As to the real estate listed in the attached list No. 1, the trading system concluded on May 13, 2010 between the defendant and 00
AA District Court B registry office on May 20, 2010, the Defendant will implement the procedure for cancellation registration of transfer of ownership, which was completed as a result of the receipt process on May 20, 2010. As to the real estate listed in the separate sheet 2, the Defendant and 00 will cancel the sales contract concluded on May 27, 2010, and the Defendant shall cancel the transfer of ownership, which was completed as AA District Court C registry office C registry office on May 28, 2010, to 00.
registration procedures shall be implemented.
2. Purport of appeal
In the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the above revocation
The dismissal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The court's explanation on the instant case is on the third page of the judgment of the court of first instance.
Section 3 of section 3 of section 3 of section 3 of section 4, 13 of section 4 as '12.31', and '4th 13th 000
000. 16. 'The 16. 'the 16. 'the 16. 'the 5. 'the 2. 'the 5. 'the 5. 'the 1
In addition to "2.............." as "4..." as "3., the reasoning of the first instance judgment is the same as that of the first instance judgment, and thus, they are quoted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is without merit.
Therefore, it is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.