1. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the defendant among the plaintiffs' lawsuits, was the articles of incorporation of October 7, 1990, which was held by the defendant at an extraordinary general meeting on September 23, 2005.

1. The defendant's basic facts are CJ's 30 years old GKL, the 30 years old by GJ, and GM also.

(GN’s “GN” is the old name of “GO.” The family relation register and the main text of the old family registration injury C is indicated as “GP,” and each part is indicated as “GP,” as well as the removed register of people whose origin is at issue in this case.

42 The calculation of the number of household units from the GJ shall be made and the same shall not apply in the absence of any other indication.

AU GH GI and QR, etc., which are 46 years old or older, are set up in the Central City, and a clan consisting of descendants who are 58 years old or older, and the plaintiffs are the members of the defendant.

On September 23, 2005, the defendant asserted that M (Tves) made a notification of convening an extraordinary general meeting, and issued a resolution to re-register E, as the chairperson, as the vice-chairperson, G, H, and I as the auditor, G, H, K, L, M, M, N, N, andO as the director (hereinafter referred to as the "first resolution") at an extraordinary general meeting (hereinafter referred to as the "first general meeting") on October 7, 1990, the defendant approved the articles of incorporation and the regulations of October 7, 2002, each of which was recorded by the defendant, and again re-register E, as the chairperson, as the vice-chairperson, as the auditor, G, as the general director, G, K, K, L, M, N, N, andO as the director (hereinafter referred to as "first resolution").

On November 9, 2013, the Defendant made a resolution to appoint P as the chairperson of the Defendant’s representative (hereinafter “the second resolution”) at the general meeting (hereinafter “the second general meeting”), and the above general meeting appears to have participated in the resolution by U, V, I, W, X, Y, Z, AA, H, AB, AC, AD, AE, AE, AF, AF, AH, K, AI, F, AJ, AJ, AK, and AL (hereinafter “U, 22 Plaintiffs, including U, 22, were present at the general meeting, but the list of the members asserted by the Plaintiffs, including U, V, I, X, Y, Z, AB, AD, AE, AF, AF, and AL (hereinafter “the second general meeting”). However, the number of members asserted by the Plaintiffs, including U, 23 persons, appears to have been 23 persons in writing, appears to have been 24 persons in writing”).

[Grounds for Recognition] Unless a dispute is asserted, and there are several numbers below Gap evidence 4, 5, 26, and 27, each number is different.