1. Of the plaintiffs' lawsuits in this case, the defendant re-appointed E at the special general meeting of September 23, 2005 as the president.

1. The defendant clan made a mid-term set of QR, QR, who is the 46-year-old descendants, and a clan consisting of descendants of D, who is the 13-year-old grandchildren, and the plaintiffs are the members of the defendant clan.

The defendant asserted that M (T) who is 28 years of age is serving as a senior citizen, and issued a notice for convening an extraordinary general meeting on September 23, 2005, and then approved the articles of incorporation of the defendant clan on October 7, 2002 and the regulations of October 7, 2002, respectively at the extraordinary general meeting on September 23, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the "first general meeting"), respectively, of E, who served as the executive officer up to that time, as the chairperson, the F as the vice-chairperson, and the H, H, I as the auditor, H, K, L, M, N, N, andO as a director (hereinafter referred to as the "first resolution").

On November 9, 2013, the Defendant made a resolution to appoint P as the chairperson of the Defendant’s clan (hereinafter “the second resolution”) at the general meeting (hereinafter “the second general meeting”), and the above general meeting appears to have participated in the resolution by U, V, I, W, X, Y, Z, AA, H, AB, AC, AE, AE, AE, AF, AH, K, AI, F, AJ, AJ, AK, AK, and AL (hereinafter “U and 22 Plaintiffs, including U, 22, U, and U, and U, and U, 23, while the list of the members asserted by the Plaintiffs appears to have been 24 persons, who are not members of the clan, and 24, who are 23 persons, appears to have written errors in the register).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 4, 5, 26, 27 (hereinafter referred to as "numbers") and Eul evidence Nos. 7 through 10, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. First of all, the plaintiffs' arguments, U and 22, who are not members of the defendant clan according to the true family register of the defendant clan, are not members of the defendant clan, and the second general meeting is participating in the resolution of the non-member of the defendant clan, and the E, who convened the second general meeting, is not a member of the defendant clan, but is reappointed at the first general meeting that is invalid.