1. The Defendant’s KRW 3,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from December 13, 2012 to December 18, 2014, and the following.

1. The Plaintiff, the cause of the instant claim, at the hospital operated by the Defendant, was performed a flaging surgery on the left side of the hospital. The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital opened part of the bones of the Plaintiff’s left side for the said surgery.

The plaintiff has been discharged from the hospital after undergoing re-operation several times after the above surgery.

However, the left part of the upper part of the upper part (referring to the upper part of the upper part) is in the state of flaging and flaging. ② The upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part is f

Nevertheless, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital discharged the Plaintiff without proper treatment, and ④ operated the medical records of the Plaintiff (it was written on October 3, 2009 and written on October 3, 2010 or added written consent for surgery).

Therefore, the defendant set the claim amount of this case (23% = 18,400,000 won) based on the amount of consolation money set by the court against the victim of death in the ordinary tort lawsuit against the plaintiff, which is equivalent to 18,400,000 won for damages equivalent to 8,781,820 won for treatment expenses and 23% for the follow-up disability rate (23% for the x labor disability rate of 80,000 won).

Ultimately, the claim of this case that the plaintiff seeks against the defendant contains the claim of consolation money.

A total of 27,181,820 won and damages for delay shall be paid.

2. Determination:

A. Basic facts 1) On October 3, 2009, the Plaintiff was involved in an accident that fell from the floor to the floor while putting up the sloping from his office to the sloping. On October 3, 2009, on October 3, 2009, the Plaintiff complained of the c hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant hospital”) by filing an appeal for the sloping to the left-hand sloping to the upper-hand sloping.

(2) The medical personnel of the Defendant hospital immediately conducted X-ray and 3th CT inspections on the Plaintiff’s injury and disease department, and diagnosed the Plaintiff’s injury and disease department by means of a laverization of the left-hand laverization, etc., and conducted a diagnosis by the Defendant hospital’s medical personnel on October 209.