A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 21, 2013, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the Incheon District Court to a fine of KRW 1.5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 7 million from the same court on January 20, 2014 to a fine of KRW 1.5 million due to the same crime, etc.

On May 8, 2015, at around 23:00, the Defendant driven a C-do motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 15km alcohol concentration 0.07% while under the influence of alcohol without obtaining a driver's license from the front of the restaurant where it is impossible to ascertain the trade name of the Mag-gu Subdivision-dong of Seongbuk-si, Sungnam-si to the front of the restaurant where it is impossible to identify, to the 107km away from the 15km section of the Seoul Metropolitan Urban Highway, which is located in the Sinsi-si Incheon Metropolitan City.

2. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. On May 8, 2015, the Defendant was exposed to the police due to a drunk driving under the foregoing paragraph (1) and was moved to E resting places located in D at Sinsi-si on May 8, 2015 and was subject to a alcohol alcohol test.

Since the license was cancelled at the time, the defendant had the right to be subject to aggravated punishment, and had the control police attempt to speak in place of the name of the birth F.

Accordingly, the Defendant issued F’s name to G, who is the police officer belonging to the expressway patrol team, and issued F’s resident registration number, and accordingly, stated “F” in the column of the C’s circumstantial statement report prepared by the said G as the end of the C’s circumstantial statement report, and forged the above F’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right by leaving the f’s name away from the f’s name.

B. The Defendant is against the above G in his job who is aware of the forgery.

As stated in the foregoing paragraph, the above state driver's circumstantial statement report stating the signature of the F was held as if it was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the statement of the situation of a drinking driver, report on the control of drinking driving, and the register of driver's licenses (No. 6 of the evidence list);

1. Previouss before judgment: Criminal records, results of inquiry;