A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 21, 2014, the Defendant driven a C car while under influence of about 0.241% of alcohol concentration in blood without a vehicle driver’s license on the road front of the 119 Safety Center in front of the 196-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Taewon-won, Seoul, at a level of about 500 meters in front of the 196-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul.

2. On September 21, 2014, the Defendant was required to present a driver’s license to the police officers assigned to the police box dispatched to the site after receiving a report at least 63 days on the roads of Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul.

The defendant presented the first class ordinary driver's license under the name of the defendant F in the name of the head of Seoul Police Agency, who is an official document in possession, as if the defendant was the defendant's driver's license.

As above, the Defendant denied official documents.

3. On September 21, 2014, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) around 07:59, at a police box located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the person who confirmed the arrest of flagrant offender; (b) the driver of the drinking driver detection report stating the alcohol concentration in blood; and (c) the driver’s name of the Defendant’s friendly F of the circumstantial statement stating the Defendant’s drinking driving report was stated in the driver’s column and signed on the next side.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, the Defendant forged each of the F in the name of “a certificate of arrest of flagrant offender”, “a report on detection of a principal driver”, and “a report on the circumstantial statement of a principal driver.”

4. The Defendant submitted to the police officer in charge the certificate of arrest of a flagrant offender, the report on detection of a host driver, and the report on the circumstantial statement of a host driver, at the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph (3).

Accordingly, the defendant held a false private document-based arrest certificate, a master driver detection report, and a master driver's circumstantial statement report.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement; 1.1.