Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2017 Highest 2373"
1. On April 15, 2017, the Defendant was found to have driven a DMW vehicle, which was owned by C before the Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu (Seoul-gu), while driving the DMW vehicle, and was exposed to drinking, and was required to present a driver’s license from the slope F belonging to the Jung-gu, Daegu-gu, Police Station Evis.
Then, the defendant, who was in possession, presented the first class of driver's license to the Dong G in Daegu District Police Agency in the name of Daegu District Police Agency, which was an official document in possession, and presented the official document as if the defendant was a driver's license to the defendant.
2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the above date, time, place, and on suspicion of the unlawful uttering of official documents, expressed that F F, who attempted to arrest a police officer F as a flagrant offender, expressed that F, “I must do so,” and assaulted F, such as assaulting the police officer F’s face on one occasion by drinking, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning traffic control and prevention of traffic hazards.
"2017 Highest 2547"
1. On April 15, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving a HWX5 car without obtaining a driver’s license from the 80-ro street of Daegu Jung-gu around 05:38 to 67 km as the center of the same Gu.
2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of drinking measurement) was driven by the Defendant at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, as seen above, while driving HW X5 automobiles from the TMW X5 automobiles, was inaccurate from the GG E District Assistant F for the Police Station in Daegu, was inaccurate, and was driven under the influence of alcohol with a large red color.
Due to considerable reasons, it was demanded to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting the whole in a drinking measuring instrument.
Nevertheless, the Defendant refused to comply with the measurement of drinking, and the place described in Paragraph 1, April 15, 2017, 05:45, 05:5:50, and 06:10 E on the same day, without justifiable grounds, requests for the measurement of drinking by police officers on three occasions in total.