1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, since the reasons for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to cutting or deleting part as follows.

2. Parts used or deleted;

A. Of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, the expression “Defendant C” shall be read as “C”, and the expression “Defendant Republic of Korea” shall be read as “Defendant” collectively.

B. To delete the third to eight parallels in the judgment of the court of first instance.

C. At the fourth bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance, one set of " February 29, 2019" as " February 29, 2018." D.

From the fifth to the second half of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “(2) the plaintiffs cannot submit evidence” was written as “(2) evidence Nos. 5-1 and 2(C) and evidence No. 6-1(C) submitted by the plaintiffs to this court. It is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiffs urged the plaintiffs to lend money or requested the cancellation of the above right to collateral security prior to the registration of the seizure of the defendant’s right to collateral security in this case, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.”

E. On the sixth one day of the judgment of the court of first instance, the phrase “A” alone shall be written with the statement of “A” No. 4 and 6 (including paper numbers) only.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.