logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.04.26 2016가단11367
임대차보증금반환
Text

1. The Plaintiff, Defendant B, and C, each of which was KRW 964,285, and Defendant D, each of which was KRW 1,446,430, and Defendant B, each of which was committed on July 29, 2016.

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On March 26, 2008, the Plaintiff leased and paid the full amount of the deposit for lease by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 27 million, and the lease deposit from March 26, 2008 to March 26, 2010.

B. The Plaintiff died on May 18, 2015 while delivering the instant building to E after the expiration of the lease term, but failed to receive the lease deposit.

C. The Defendants, as some inheritors of E, completed each registration of ownership transfer on shares of 18/504 among the instant buildings, and Defendant D’s 27/504 shares among the instant buildings, and inherited the above lease deposit obligation owed by E to the Plaintiff according to their respective inheritance shares.

Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to pay to the Plaintiff each amount stated in the purport of the claim corresponding to their respective inheritance shares among the above lease deposit.

2. Applicable provisions;

(a) Defendant B or D: Judgment made by deemed confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

(b) Defendant C: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

arrow