logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원통영지원 2016.09.28 2016가단3545
임대차보증금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 120,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from December 30, 2015 to May 16, 2016.

Reasons

1. On October 22, 2013, the Plaintiff used the lease deposit amounting to KRW 120,000,000 among the three-story buildings owned by the Defendant, which were owned by the Defendant from the Defendant, and the lease period from December 30, 2013 to December 29, 2015.

Despite the Plaintiff’s delivery of the above 301 to the Defendant prior to the expiration date of the lease term, the Defendant did not refund the lease deposit to the Plaintiff even after the expiration date of the lease term.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the lease deposit KRW 120,000,000 and damages for delay.

2. The judgment of deemed confessions based on recognition (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208(3) of the Civil Procedure Act), the Defendant served the original copy of the payment order in the Changwon District Court 2016Da399, Changwon District Court 2016Da399 prior to the implementation of the instant lawsuit, and submitted a formal objection to this. Since the Defendant did not appear on the date of pleading without submitting a specific written response, it is deemed that all the Plaintiff

arrow