beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiffs’ conclusion of each lease agreement 1) Plaintiff A, a practicing licensed real estate agent operating the F Real Estate Agent Office on April 13, 2013, is “I” (hereinafter “the instant multi-family house”) which is a multi-family house located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H from the network G by the brokerage of Defendant D, a practicing licensed real estate agent operating the F Real Estate Agent Office.
(2) Article 201 of the former Lease Contract No. 201 of the former Lease Contract Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 20100, Apr. 18, 2013; Presidential Decree No. 2010, Apr. 17, 2015; Presidential Decree No. 20135, Apr. 17,
(2) On June 26, 2013, Defendant E, a practicing licensed real estate agent operating the “J Real Estate Agent Office” on June 26, 2013, the Plaintiff B leased the instant multi-family house 601 square meters (area 20 square meters) from the deceased G from June 27, 2013 to June 26, 2015 (hereinafter “instant lease contract”) by setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 55 million, the lease period from June 27, 2013 to June 26, 2015 (hereinafter “instant lease contract”) and by paying all the said lease deposit to the deceased G by the day of the same month, and after completing the instant multi-family house 601 delivered, the moving-in report was made on June 27, 2015 on the date of the same month.
3) On June 26, 2013, Plaintiff C leased the instant multi-family house 204 square meters (area of approximately 17 square meters) from Dong G as a broker of Defendant E, with the lease deposit for KRW 50 million and the lease period from June 26, 2013 to June 25, 2015 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).
(B) On the 26th day of the same month, the above lease deposit was paid to the deceased G, and the instant multi-family house 601 was handed over, and the moving-in report was completed on the 27th day of the same month, and the fixed date was confirmed in the lease agreement. B. Defendant D’s act of mediating Defendant D and E was concluded on the instant multi-family house to the Plaintiff at the time of the conclusion of the instant lease agreement (hereinafter “the instant lease agreement”).