The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. In the facts charged, the Defendant is a teacher in charge of social subjects at C secondary school located in B when smugglinged.

At around 14:10 on December 28, 2015, the Defendant had a good appraisal of the victim D (son, 42) who was a partner of the same workplace in the above C Middle School School Department, and had been previously there, and the Defendant who completed a course of study and returned to the principal office of the principal office of the principal office of the principal office of the Defendant who returned to the principal office of the principal office of the principal office of the principal office of the principal.

In the instant case, the victim assaulted the victim on the ground that the victim was able to wear clothes on the victim’s chest with the left hand, and that the victim was able to unfold the hands on the part of the other part of the arms, with the right hand.

2. The judgment is the case falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The records show that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the victim after the prosecution of this case.

3. According to the conclusion, the instant prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.