The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case and the victim B (the age of 43) are married with a couple.

On October 7, 2016, the Defendant used both 15:00-16:00 to 16:00 for assaulting the victim in the D real estate clerical work indoors of Speaker-si C, and used both her hand floor and the tamping water one time each.

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged of this case are crimes falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, a written agreement was submitted to the effect that the defendant shall not be punished on April 10, 2017, which was after the public prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.