logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013.09.26 2013도9137
강간치상
Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The term "juvenile" under Article 60 (2) of the Juvenile Act refers to a juvenile under Article 2 of the Juvenile Act, and Article 2 of the Juvenile Act refers to a person under the age of 19 who is a juvenile under the age of 19, and since it is the condition of a trial, it shall be deemed that not only the time of crime but also the time of trial should be continued until the time of trial. Therefore, as a matter of principle, the determination of whether a juvenile is a juvenile under Article 60 (2) of the Juvenile Act shall be based on the time of adjudication of fact-finding court (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Do2704, Aug. 18, 200). Thus, the argument that the determination

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

arrow