1. All appeals filed by Plaintiffs A and E are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff A and the defendant E respectively.

1. The following facts may be acknowledged by taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 11, 12, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 6, 10, and 13 (including each number):

From May 20, 2011 to July 22, 2011, Defendant D leased Kameras and its affiliated devices (hereinafter “each of the instant Kameras” and “the instant 1 to 5 Cameras”) from the Plaintiffs, the lessor of Kameras, on five occasions, as indicated in the following table, for the purpose of using them for photographing the film.

On May 20, 2011, A (H) RED M-X 1 watt film film on May 20, 16, 201, 40 million 16,000,000 C (I) SOY PW-EX 2 film on June 1, 201, 4.8 million 6.5 million 8 million 6.5,65 million 3,000 3.3 (I) SONM-EM 2,000 2,65 million 2,000 3.5,000 2,000 3.5,000 20,000 2,000 2,000 2,000,000 3,000 2,05,000 1,000 2,05,00 2,05,00 of 3,00 25,015 Z.

B. When Defendant E operates the pawned Hall in Gangnam-gu SeoulJ, it lent money to Defendant D as collateral from August 2009, and around December 2009, Defendant D lent money to 20 U.S., and Defendant D did not pay money borrowed from Defendant D to 20 U.S., but did not pay money.

Defendant E, throughout nine times from March 24, 201, had been leased by Defendant D from the Plaintiffs and the co-Plaintiffs in the first instance trial, as security, totaling KRW 157 million to Defendant D, including each of the instant carcas in this case.